We are still in the process of adding maps and implementing all the basic functions. Rating at this moment is only available to the developers, so don’t take those scores all too seriously, yet!
We are still in the process of adding maps and implementing all the basic functions. Rating at this moment is only available to the developers, so don’t take those scores all too seriously, yet!
or perhaps take them even more seriously
stupid experts!
Just wanted to leave this for you to see based on some things I found whiel browsing today. Take or leave.
I was using Internet Explorer (I know none of us actually use this outdated browser anymore). My screen resolution on the computer I accessed from was 1152×864.
1) Map images were being stretched vertically when I went into each maps page.
2) An addition I would suggest is that in the rating bar area for when rating a specific map — you include a miniaturized version of the key for quick reference (maybe make the description of each score pop-up when hovered over?)
3) The search function I think needs some refinement. When doing a general search for say Team Names (TWP, ESV, DF, etc. . .) I found that maps that began with the search term were being sorted underneath other maps. This is counter-productive.
4) A sort function added to search results would be a great addition (say allow sorts by “date”, “score”, etc. . .).
Hi Sigma, thanks very much for the feedback. I will definitely look in to your suggestions, the one about having descriptions of the map ratings when you hover over the bar is a great one.
Further ways of sorting and ordering the map list are on my to-do list